Specific details about the AGM will be
posted here over the next few months.
Voting delegates
confirmed to date:
|
BC |
John Rance |
|
Yukon |
Pam James |
|
Alberta |
Don Riddle |
|
Saskatchewan |
|
|
Manitoba |
Jennifer Hamilton |
|
Ontario |
Ian
Sidders |
|
Quebec |
Michael MacConaill |
|
New Brunswick |
Harold McQuade |
|
Nova Scotia |
|
NOMINATIONS
Dave Graupner for VP Finance
(moved by Tim Lee, seconded by Jennifer Hamilton)
Andree Powers for Board Member
(moved by Don Riddle, seconded by Kim Kasperski)
EVENT BIDS
No event bids received to date.
MOTIONS
The deadline for
motions to be submitted was August 10th.
Motions received:
MOTION 1
Moved by the COF Board of Directors
1a)
To accept the proposed rule revisions as presented with the
exception of those that have been subsequently amended.
1b) to amend rule 3.4.1 to:
At Championship and 'A' Meets, all participants in classes other
than Open, Bg. or WF shall be current members of a P/TOA that is a
member of the COF or of a member nation of the IOF.
MOTION 2
Moved by
Michael MacConaill. Seconded by Colin Kirk
Move that the
COF supports the position of
National Team Leaders, Junior and Senior, by providing financial
support for air travel,
registration fees, accommodation/meals and other WOC/JWOC expenses
to a maximum of $2000. This support is to be for such WOC/JWOC to
which COF send an officially selected team, and
shall apply to the 2009 teams.
COF Board opinion: We fully support the intent
of this motion, but recommend not supporting the motion as written
because of the budget implications as well as the implications with
regards to the role of the national team coach as well as the team
leader. $4000 is 25% percent of the COF budget and committing this
amount without considering the context of the entire COF budget and
priorities would be unwise, especially in light of the strategic
planning process that the COF board is currently undertaking. We
have been able to increase the amount given to the team leaders
recently because of successful fundraising efforts by the national
teams (HPP fund). We now have a national team coach who this year
worked closely with the JWOC team leader and is the team leader for
WOC, so passing this motion without considering the role of the team
leader in conjunction with the national team coach would be awkward.
We have recently endorsed the terms of reference for the rejuvenated
High Performance Committee and they will be looking closely at the
HPP fund and its allocation as well as providing suggestions to the
COF Board regarding the need for COF general funds for high
performance. In summary, both the COF Board and the High Performance
Committee agree that increased financial support to the team leaders
and national coach is important and needs to be considered in the
context of the entire COF budget/planning process.
MOTION 3
Moved by
Bill Anderson. Seconded by Colin Kirk
Move that
the COF waive the 25% levy on all junior participants to encourage
the event organizers to drastically reduce the junior entry fees.
Background information provided by the mover:
The very low numbers of
participating juniors at this year’s COCs (as well as previous
years) must be addressed.
The cost of participation for families at our events
is a major factor in the decision to not attend. When the
cost of entry fees for children starts adding up to hundreds of
dollars there is only one option left to families – they won’t go!
These negative decisions directly impact the attendance at the
junior training camp (an important development activity) as well as
the participation of the parents. We are a family sport.
Given the number of juniors that are attending the events the impact
on revenues is not a valid excuse for charging high entry fees. For
2010, the Ottawa Club is considering a “family rate” – i.e.: where
juniors are virtually free if parents or a guardian sign up for the
event. I trust that this motion will generate discussion
on all aspects of increasing junior participation at our major
events.
COF Board opinion: The current levy structure
requires reviewing and we suggest that the COF Board undertake a
review of the levy structure with input from the provincial/territorial
orienteering associations and the Canadian orienteering community.
We do not support this motion without a without having a more
comprehensive look at the current levy structure. We agree that
encouraging more junior participation at major events is important.
MOTION 4
Moved by
Harold McQuade. Seconded by Stig Skarborn
Move that the Canadian Orienteering Federation
create a contact list for suppliers of base maps and for mappers
willing to work in Canada, and that this information be posted on
the COF web site.
COF Board opinion: We can certainly post this list on the COF web
site, but we would require volunteer assistance from a non COF Board
member(s) to develop and update the list. Suggestions for content on
the COF web site are always welcome and do not require an AGM
motion.
MOTION 5
Moved by Don Scott.
Seconded by Mary Lou Hogg
Addition to the Age Categories in
the COF Rules
Ross Burnett and Brent Langbakk are to be congratulated on their
well reasoned 10 Course and Category guidelines which were approved
in October, 2006 and I assume will now be included in the revisions
to the COF Rules. I was especially pleased about their thinking
where to include the M75 and W75 Categories. It was in 2002 when
some of us were advocating having the 75 age categories and Pat de
St Croix successfully carried this through at the 2005 AGM. It is
now 7 years since the push for the 75 age category was implemented
and some of us now are well past 75 and the COF should consider
implementing the next age category. I think the COF should be
proactive in this regard. I am not suggesting that new courses or
new Recommended Winning Times be implemented. Age categories beyond
75 can be included on the same courses as the 75 age category and
the RWTs do not have to be changed. The groups older than 75 would
just be at the long end of the RWT ranges. It also gives the older
age orienteers an opportunity to compare their split times and route
choices with the young 75s.
I know
there will be the usual concerns about small numbers in the older
age categories but that does not seem to be of concern in the
younger age categories. Most orienteers like to have their results
listed and compared to others in the same age group. Small numbers
do not seem to bother the organizers of the World Masters
Orienteering Championships and being able to say that orienteers in
an older age group still compete is a source of pride in declaring
that orienteering is “A Sport for Life”.
You will note that I
have not yet stated what the next age category should be. I
recommend that after the age 75 category that the COF switch to 5
year age categories, that is, 80-84, 85-89, etc. My reasons for this
recommendation are based on my observations of older athletes. After
80, people encounter many illnesses and injuries. Modern medicine
can cure us of many of these problems but recovery times are long
and one physical problem often leads to another. The change in one’s
physical prowess from 75 to 80 is greater than the change from 65 to
75 and much greater than that from 55 to 65. I should emphasize that
these changes do not include mental prowess; older athletes and
others engaged in thinking activities, such as orienteering, remain
sharp and clear.
This change in
physical prowess is not surprising. I give you the following quote:
The Biblical quote about the span of our lives, from Psalms 90:10:
“The days of our years are threescore years and ten;
and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years,
yet is their strength labor and sorrow;
for it is soon cut off, and we fly away.”
Translation of the Bible in today’s words:
“The days of our years are seventy,
or even by reason of strength eighty years;
yet their pride is but labor and sorrow,
for it passes quickly, and we fly away.”
The reference to labor and sorrow tells that once past seventy years
one’s strength is affected by ill health and injury. After eighty
years life is close to an end.
In the 2000 years since the above was written the human body has
evolved little. Modern medicine can keep us alive and moving through
the forest after 80 years but “labor and sorrow” still rules us.
Having reached the age of
four score and one and in training for the World Masters
Games in Australia
this fall, I can attest to labor and sorrow. I conclude my
recommendation with a poem.
Orienteering after Three Score and Ten
Lines by the late Mr. Thomas Anderson, banker, Hamilton
Modified by Don Scott
I sailed o'er the lovely Loch Lomond,
I gazed on the cloud-shrouded Ben,
And I said, I have orienteered below that proud summit
Long ago - it is no matter when,
I was then but a stripling of forty,
And now I am after three score and ten.
The sun shines as brightly as ever
On the lake, on the isles, on the Ben;
But the sunshine of youth has passed o'er me,
And can never return back again.
Alas! for the spring time of forty!
Alas! for the threescore and ten!
As I sit by the brink of the waters,
Near the foot of a beautiful glen,
My spirit comes back fresh as ever,
And I think I could yet run M two score and ten;
But no, the rheumatics say, "Never",
And whisper, "You're past three score and ten."
Don Scott
April 2009
COF Board opinion: We agree with the intent of
this suggestion. We suggest a specific motion such as: Understanding
that 5 year age category are appropriate for athletes over 75, it is
moved that the COF introduce a 80-84 age category and 85+ age
category for both men and women. These athletes would compete on the
same course as the current 75+ age category. And we'd like to
recognize Don for submitting the most interestingly worded
submission. This is likely the first time that an AGM submission has
included poetry :-)